BCS = Not Fair
Posted by mizzou1028 on December 1, 2008
One quick note about the BCS standings released today. I am unable to express my true feelings on Oklahoma jumping Texas for the number two spot, and with it a trip to the Big 12 Championship game, because, well, this is a family column. Let’s just say that if you took one letter out of BCS you might get what it really is. Does head to head not matter at all? Texas beat Oklahoma on a neutral field in October. Both teams have the same record. How does that make Oklahoma more deserving of a spot in the conference title game, and by extension an inside track to the national championship game? Sure, the Sooners have scored a boatload of points, but it shouldn’t matter how hot they’ve been the past two games. The final standings should reflect the entire body of work for the season. The BCS essentially rewards teams for losing early in the season, and that is simply not fair. No doubt Texas fans will be rooting for Missouri to upset OU on Saturday night at Arrowhead. This situation is exactly why the BCS needs to be dumped. It is ridiculous to suggest that Oklahoma is any more deserving than Texas (or any other one loss team) for the number two spot. Unfortunately money seems to get the way of common sense here. I’ll say it again, this year screams for a playoff more than ever. My proposal for a playoff is coming this week, so stay tuned for that.
Doug Baker said
I couldn’t agree with you more!